Download Mundari Book

 


kuril-lekai
‘I shall try first to jump’

Here it denotes the idea of attempting.

(iii) For refusal and prohibition etc., where /alo/ precedes the verb, the /k/ may be suffixed to /alo/ outside the verb to express request.

alokai sena
‘please let us not go’

Here, the pronominal subject is without the copulative /a/, it is only euphonic at this place.
The impersonal construction like alo-kaia ‘let me not be obliged to it’ is also possible.
Apart from the normal verbal construction it is also freely used in phrase with /alo/, suffixed to it, denoting a polite prohibition or detention.
2.4.2.7. Personal suffixes:
Such affixes are contracted forms of the personal pronouns and are included in the verbal constructions as subject or object, direct and indirect. Parallel to the personal pronouns, they are also eleven in number.

Singular
Dual
plural
1st Person
i
la (incl.)
bu(incl.)
li(excl.)
le(excl.)
2nd Person
m
ben
pe
3rd Person
e
ki
ko

All these forms, as evident, are without the free form marker /a/. However, by being suffixed to the f.v.m. in the verb, they appear to make it up, although the two must not be confused. Standing separately as a pronoun (substantive), they take /a-/, the free form marker, as prefix and without that, they themselves function as suffixes.
2.4.2.7.1 Morphophnological variations:
Generally, the forms of these affixes do not change, but some variations may be noted:
(i) /iN/, when suffixed to a word ending in /e/ the sounds [e] and [i] form a falling diphthong, where [i] is very weak and may even be dropped, as in /rei/ > /re/.
(ii) As an infix standing intervocalically, the affix /i/, looses the final // and remains only as //, as in /kać/, which is /ka-i-a/ ‘it is not me’.
(iii) The form /-m/ takes an euphonic [e], when the former is added to the word ending in consonant, as in /loegem/.
(iv) /-m/ takes a suffix of /e/ and it becomes /me/ when it is added to a copula /tan/ in substantive prepositions as in /munda tanme/, or when it is suffixed to mena? or bano? before the coupla, as in /mena?mea/, or when it stands as second personal singular in the imperative mood - /hiju?me/.
(v) The third singular /e/, can hardly retain its original form and more frequently it is softned to /i/ or to the cheched i?. The original form may be observed in the verbal constructions as a subject after the f.v.m. where it may even form a diphthong.
(vi) After /i/, /o/ or any consonant, the affix /e/ becomes very short as in [sadom-e&-lel-kia].
(vii) Suffixed to a word ending in [e] itself, this forms a long counterpart and is no more heard independently.
(viii) After the copula /tan/ as a subject, the [e) changes to [i?[ as in /tani?/.
It may here be noted that /i?/ or /i/ has become the standard form for indicating third person singular animate. Which is original /e/ or /i/ ? This decision would naturally rest with the speaker who uses /a?e/ as the person singular animate. Therefore, in accordance with the method applied for
 

 

Previous

Next

top

 
Mundari Index Page
 
FeedBack | Contact Us | Home
ciil grammar footer