|
If
kinship nouns have a modifier, plural marker is added to
the modifier or to the whole noun phrase.
|
|
Examples
tá
mhm
c-á
good elder brothers or those good
brother good that pl. elder brothers(elder)
|
|
If
a noun is modified by a quantifier, the quantifier comes
in the end. |
|
Examples
kyn-tn
group of men
men quantifier |
|
If
other attributes are used along with the quantifier, the
quantifier always occurs in the end.
kyn
mhm
tn
group of good men
man good quantifier |
|
Hence,
plural marker and quantifier are in non-contrastive distribution.
They do not occur with the noun if the other member is present.
If the numerical attributes and qualifying attributes of
a noun are added together then the numerical attribute always
comes in the end. |
|
Examples
frò
mhm
mótsà
one good dog
dog good one kì
mhm
nì
two good houses
house good two |
|
If
the noun is qualified by the same type of adjectives then
the order of the adjective is not rigid. If the number marker
is added, it is added to the whole noun phrase.
|
|
Example
|
|
L°ksà
|
basket |
lksà
|
my basket |
my basket |
|
lksà
mhm
|
my good basket |
my basket good |
|
lksà
tsphv
mhm
|
my good big basket |
my basket big good |
|
lksà
myóm
tsphv
mhm
|
my red big good basket |
my basket red big good |
|
lksà
myóm
tsphv
mhm
cá |
Those my red big good baskets |
my basket red big good
that pl. |
|
|
|
|
|
In
the above sentence, similar adjectives like myóm,
tsphv
and mh°m
do not have rigidity in order. They can be interchanged.
In case of other modifiers the order is rigid. In Lotha,
following types of modifiers can be noticed.
1. Qualitative
2. Numerical
3. Quantitative |
|
Order
among the qualitative modifiers is not rigid. If a qualitative
modifier is used along with numerical modifier, the order
is rigid. In that case, numerical modifier always comes
in the end. |
|
Examples
frò
mhm
®thm
three good dogs
dog good three |
|
If
a qualitative modifier and quantitative modifier are used,
the order is rigid and the quantitative modifier always
comes in the end. |