| 5. In Bhumij, the deletion of subject pronoun 
    is common. The simple sentences like 
 | 
                    
   | 
      
        
          | 21.
 | aiŋ
 | sen - a - iŋ
 |  |  
          |  | I | go-cop-PT | ‘I go’ |  | 
                    
   | 
      
        
          | 22.
 | aiŋ
 | jom - a - iŋ
 |  |  
          |  | I | eat - cop -PT | ‘I eat’ |  | 
                    
   | 
      
        
          | 23.
 | aiŋ
 | hi?i-dha
  i 
          - a - iŋ |  |  
          |  | I | come | can-cop-PT |  | 
                    
   |  | 
                    
   | may be expressed in the negative construction 
    as,
 
 | 
                    
   | 
      
        
          | 24.
 | ka-iŋ 
          sena
 | ‘(I) do not go’
 |  
          | 25.
 | ka-iŋ 
          joma
 | ‘(I) do not eat’
 |  
          | 26.
 | ka-iŋ 
          hi?i-dha
  ia | ‘(I) can not come’
 |  | 
                    
    | where the negative marker occurs in the 
    senetence initial position. Though the negative marker occurs with person marker in the sentence initial position as 
    shown above, there is a difference between the two. The person marker is repeated along with the subject pronoun but, it 
    is not possible when the negative marker occurs in the sentence initial position. This may be seen in the following 
    sentences :
 
 | 
                    
   | 
      
        
          | 27.
 | aiŋ 
          - iŋ
 | sena
 | ‘I go’
 |  
          | 28.
 | aiŋ 
          - iŋ
 | joma
 | ‘I eat’
 |  
          | 29.
 | *ka - aiŋ-iŋ
 | sena
 | ‘I do not go’
 |  
          | 30.
 | *ka - aiŋ-iŋ
 | joma
 | ‘I do not eat’
 |  | 
                    
   | The occurence of person marker with other 
    grammatical categories like conjunction, postposition, adverb etc., may be seen in the chapter 6.2.3.
      Though the negative marker ka-occurs in the sentence initial position and 
    when the subject is deleted optionally with perosn marker, as seen below, there is a 
    difference between the subject occuring at the sentence initial position and 
    the negative marker occuring with the person marker.
 
 | 
                    
   | 
      
        
        | 31.
 | kage,
 | a?e
 | aiŋ-a
 | haga
 | ka-heke
 |  
        |  | No, | he | I-case | brother | neg-is |  | 
                    
 | 
      
        
          | ‘No, he is not my brother’ |  | 
                    
 | 
      
        
         | 32.
 | kage,
 | a?e
 | aiŋ-a
 | suŋgu:ti
 | ka-heke
 |  
         |  | No, | he | I-case | friend | neg-is |  | 
                    
 | 
      
        
          | ‘No, he is not my friend’ |  | 
                    
 | 
      
        
       | 33.
 | kage,
 | 
  ia  a | bir
 | ka-heke
 |  
       |  | No, | this | forest | neg-is |  | 
                    
 | 
      
        
          | ‘No, this is not a forest’ |  | 
                    
 |  | 
                    
|  | 
                    
 | But the pronoun takes the person marker with the subject 
    as shown below:
 
 | 
                    
 | 
      
        
         | 35.
 | aiŋ-iŋ
 | sena
 | ‘I go’
 |  
         | 36.
 | aiŋ-iŋ
 | joma
 | ‘I eat’
 |  | 
                    
 | But this kind of construction is not possible 
    with negative :
 
 | 
                    
 | 
      
        
          | 37.
 | *ka-aiŋ-iŋ
 | sena
 |  
          | 38.
 | *ka-aiŋ-iŋ
 | joma
 |  | 
                    
 | When the tag question occurs in a sentence, the 
    positive sentence takes negative tag question and the negative sentence takes positive tag question as seen in the following 
    sentences. | 
                    
 | 
      
        
          | 39.
 | ramo
 | jo-ko
 | au - l - a,  ka - au - l - a -
  i |  
          |  | Rama | fruit-pl. | bring-tense neg. bring-tense-que |  | 
                    
 | 
      
        
          | ‘Rama brought the fruits, didn’t bring? |  |