Download Urali Book

 
A DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS OF URALI
Sam Mohan Lal
   iii) Tense (nonpast)
As stated earlier (4.6), Urali has only two way distinction to express tense. They are, past and nonpast. Past tense is marked with different morphemes whereas there is no overt marker to denote the nonpast tense in this speech form. As a result of this, in the affirmative nonpast sentences, the nonpast relative participle form is expressed by the verb root + L.M. + the nonpast Ø + relative participle. The nonpast relative participle construction can be identified with reference to the following noun which is being qualified by the participle notion.
   a) Nonpast
   menni-k-Ø-a aä (5.1) > mennikka aä ‘brother who forgives’
   nil-k-Ø-a dou (5.1,3) > nikka dou ‘the bison which stands’
   var-g-Ø-a aä (5.19) > varuga aä ‘brother who comes’
   e:-vus-g-Ø-aaä(5.19) > e:vusuga aä ‘brother who cause to break’
   b) Past
   va:s-in-a a:u > va:sina a:u ‘(one who) combed’
   namb-in-a a:u > nambina au ‘(one who) believed’
   kaRa-nd-a a:u > kaRanda a:u ‘(one who) milked’
   ė:R-is-in-a a:u > ė:Risina a:u ‘(one who) caused to climb’
   iv) Negative relative participle
   me:g-a:d-a > me:ga:da ‘(that which) does/did not graze’
   äa-k-a:d-a > äakka:da (5.1) ‘(one who) does/did not measure’
   ki:-k-a:d-a > kikka:da (5.1) ‘(one who) does/ did not tear’
   ki:-pis-g-a:d-a (5.1,19) > ki:ppisuga:da ‘(one who) does/did not to tear’
4.12 Verbal Participle
There are two verbal participle markers. There is no explicit marker to denote the positive verbal participle. The marker used for the negative verbal participle is -a which follows always the negative marker -a:d (4.7.1.1)
      St.- [Tr.] - [cau.] [-L.M.] Neg1 {-Ø}
             -Ø, -e

                                       

Previous

  |  

Next

Top


 
Urali Index Page
 
FeedBack | Contact Us | Home
ciil grammar footer