Download Mao Naga Book

 


 
     

{ osi }2

 

 

  f. pfokhrumüi1 {*pfokhrumüi si }  kaxi3 bu-e4
     

{ *pfosi }

 
         
     

they (incl. pl.)1

 have 4 two3 dogs2
         
     

{ ohĩ} 2

 
(b) 418 a.

omüi-hi1 {          }

kaxi 3 bu-e4
     

{ *pfohi) }

 
         
     

man1 has4 two3

 eyes2
         
     

 

 
     

{ ophi } 2

 

 

b.  

omüi-hi1 {           }

kaxi3 bu-e4
     

{ *pfophi}

 
         
     

man1 has4 two3

hands2

3.3.6.2.
 

The Deictic Pronoun
 

The deictic pronominal system categorizes spatial distance into speaker- proximate, listener-proximate and interlocutor-remote pigeonholes. Listener-proximate is further divided into absolutely listener-proximate and relatively listener-proximate pronouns and interlocutor-remote into proximate and distant pronouns the later being not too common. Each of these five classes has singular, dual and plural numbers. Gender is not marked in the plural marked -khru i.e. the plural pronouns marked by -khru are epicene, and native speaker intuition is surprisingly divided over the marking of gender in the dual; this variability in native-speaker intuition is indicated by a parenthesized question mark. Two question marks in parenthesis, on the other hand, would indicate unanimity of native-speaker intuition about the in felicitousness of the construction. Logically, of course, gender cannot be marked in the dual either by the human gender markers -na, -o and -püi, because these mark singular number as we saw in 3.3.2. Apart from the gender markers (with the caveat entered above), human person, diminutive markers, and various other forms-case markers, postpositions and contentives- can be added to these demonstrative bases resulting in an incredibly productive set of demonstrative forms. Most of them are adverbial in character, and express local semantic functions.
 

Rule 1. dem + indvtr pronoun
    (eg. hi + hi => hihi ‘this)
     

 

2. dem + cntv + indvtr => adverb
    (eg. hi ni (‘day’) + hi = hinihi ‘this day’)

where indvtr = individuator and cntv = contentive and dem = demonstrative base.
 
The set thus generated, illustrative rather than exhaustive, follows each paradigm of what may be called more basic forms. The forms are not phonetically absolutely cohesive in that the potential pause possible between morphemes is not absolute.

3.3.6.2.1.
 
 Speaker-proximate
    sg. du. pl
  base form hihi hihĩhi hikhruhi
        hitahi
        hitakkruhi

 

       

1.

 ta ‘kind’ hitahi(?) hitahĩhi hitahi
        hitakhruhi
         

2.

-na hinahi

__

*hinakhruhi
  inanimate or     hinatahi
  material entity     hinatakhruhi
  and hum. masc.     hinatakhrumüihi
         

3.

püi hipüihi hipüihĩhi(??)  
  hum. fem.      
         

4.

-müi himüihi

__

hikhrumüihi
  hum. person     hi (ta) khrumüi
         

5.

(i) o dim. hiohi hiohĩhi hiokhruhi
        hiotakhruhi
        hiotahi
         
  (ii) himüiohi

__

hiokhrumüihi

a.

dim. hum.     hiotakhrumüihi
        hiotamüihi
         

b.

dim. masc. hinaohi

__

__

  dim. material      
  entity      
         

c.

 

dim. fem.

 

hipüiohi

 

__

 

__

 

 

Previous   

Next

Top

 
Mao Naga Index Page
 
FeedBack | Contact Us | Home
ciil grammar footer