Theory of binding Book

 
TOWARDS AN ALTERNATIVE
THEORY OF BINDING
Abhilasha Jain
and
B.N. Patnaik
Turning to the reduplicated anaphor apna-apna, consider the following sentences:
 
(19)  
[ram aur mohan] ne apni-ani kitabe pari
                     i        i

Ram and mohan CM each-each books read+PAST

(Ram and Mohan each read self's book = Ram and Mohan read their own books)

     
(20)   [ram aur mohan] ne sita aur gita ko
                     i

Ram and mohan CM sita and gita CM

apni - apni kitabe di
   i

each - each books give+PAST

(Ram and Mohan gave his own books to Sita and Gita respectively.)

     
(21)   [ram aur mohan] ko apne-apne gahr pasand hai
                    i           i

Ram and Mohan CM each-each home appeal be+PRES

(Ram and Mohan each likes his own home.)

 
The verb in (19) and (2) is agentive; in the former the verb is monotransitive, in the latter it is ditransitive. (21) is the familiar dative-subject construction. The anaphor apna-apna's antecedent is ram aur mohan in all the sentences. In (19) and (20) each ram aur mohan is the agent and in (21) it is are the perceiver. Thus, (15) receives further support from the behaviour of the anaphor apna-pana.
 
Now consider the last A-anaphor of Hindi we have listed, namely, apna. This anaphor, like the reduplicated apna, can occur in the specifier position of an NP expressing possession. Unlike apna-apna, this anaphor can occur in argument positions other than the specifier position as well. In the possessessive phrase the anaphor has the role of the possessor and the head of phrase has the role of the object of possession, as in (22) - (25) below:
 
 
Theory of Binding Page
 
FeedBack | Contact Us | Home
ciil grammar footer