Theory of binding Book

 
TOWARDS AN ALTERNATIVE
THEORY OF BINDING
Abhilasha Jain
and
B.N. Patnaik
(5)   [ram aur hari] ne ek dusre ko mithai khilayi
                i              i

Ram and hari CM each other CM sweet feed+PAST

(                                                                )

     
(6)   [ram aur hari] ne sita aur gita ko ek dusre ki
                i                                   i

Ram and Hari CM sita and gita CM each other CM

kitabe di

books give+PaST

(Ram and Hari gave Sita and Gita each other's books.)

     
(7)   [ram aur hari] ko ek dusre ki kitabe bahut
                 i             i

Ram and Hari CM each other CM books very

acchi lagi

nice preceive+PAST

(Ram and Hari liked each ther's books very much.)

 
In (5) and (6) ram aur hari is the antecedent of the anaphor ek dusre. Notice that the antecedent is the agent in both. In the dative subject construction (7), however, ram aur hari which is the antecedent of ek dusre is not the agent in the sentence; we will call it the perceiver.
 
The anaphor ek dusre thus refers to either the agent or the perceiver in the sentence depending on which of the two is present. Since the verbs choosing the agent and the perceiver belong to different types, one action, the other stative, there is no possibility of a sentence containing both the agent and the perceiver. Now, in the following dative subject construction.
 
 
Theory of Binding Page
 
FeedBack | Contact Us | Home
ciil grammar footer